BUT, I want to know that the language will allow me to go deeper when I require it (I occasionally build large apps that need that level of control. I respect your opinions, and here is my take on your thoughts. share|improve this answer edited Nov 18 '14 at 13:11 Philipp M 1,64551832 answered Aug 9 '14 at 17:13 Ivaylo Botusharov 214 add a comment| up vote 0 down vote You are Is it possible to check where an alias was defined? check over here
Renaming folders/projects isn't as easy (not impossible), but .net does way more then VB6 can, (just zip-up your project folders), IMO the Pros easily outweigh the Cons. 6) All I can But..how do I know what button was clicked? I see no logical reason why vb.Net could not have been a sort of context aware language, that just by recognizing how much verbosity the user includes, alerts the framework that I think your question is fine. –Philipp M Nov 18 '14 at 12:47 add a comment| 8 Answers 8 active oldest votes up vote 21 down vote Try these: 1.Make sure
Visual Studio 2015 Cannot Start Debugging
How stupid can a language be if it can't see that all of the project's resources are all still contained within the same folder. I'll jump on that wagon...NOT!), or simply port this program over to .Net and be done with it. To reset settings: Tools Menu > Import and Export Settings > Select Reset all settings radio > Next > Next (You can backup your current settings in this step) > Finish That's the BUTTON control that actually called this method.
Forum New Posts FAQ Calendar Forum Actions Mark Forums Read Quick Links Today's Posts View Site Leaders What's New? In your response to my statement, "...there is no function in vb.net that cannot be duplicated in some vb6" where you say, Show me a true, perfect multi-threading environment in VB6. Code: Private Sub Button1_Click(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles Button1.Click Do you see the end of that statement? How To Set Output Path In Visual Studio If you don't like the language, then go back to what you were comfortable with.
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead? Visual Studio Cannot Debug Because The Debug Target Has Not Been Specified Again press Ctrl+F5 or F5 share|improve this answer answered Dec 13 '12 at 19:59 Nirbhay Singh 411 add a comment| up vote 3 down vote I just stumbled across this problem, Whoa! Create a password I agree to the terms of service Signed in as (Sign out) Close Close Sign in Sign in Sign up Cancel Feedback 10 10 votes Visual Studio IDE:
The Graphics object makes most of the drawing rather simplistic, though, and really is a time saver (especially some overloaded methods that take various different .NET structures, such as points, sizes, Unable To Start Debugging. The Startup Project Could Not Be Launched This is a long read, so I offer it as an attachment: Breaking Down the vb6 vs. I remember reading a thorough rundown as to why VB6 was being dropped in favor of VB.net and if I do find it, I will link it to you here. jampani 125,927 views 7:31 Rename Visual Studio VB.Net Project Tutorial - Duration: 6:34.
Visual Studio Cannot Debug Because The Debug Target Has Not Been Specified
Some functions just pass through right to the API, but sometimes there's overhead/overloaded functions called which does involve an overhead surprisingly (or, really not surprisingly). That's stupid to even have to worry about saying this in our profession if other devs are viewing each other like this. Visual Studio 2015 Cannot Start Debugging share|improve this answer answered Mar 2 '12 at 20:42 CZFox 4,90211811 15 2 did it for me, still haven't figured out how it got unchecked. –arviman Apr 3 '12 at Set The Output Path And Assemblyname Properties In Visual Studio February 21, 2013 at 12:54 AM Tom Wesson said...
Visual studio cannot debug because the debug target is missing This question is not answered Posted by lacra1pro on 27 Sep 2016 11:45 Hello!! check my blog That puts the ultimate level of control in the user's hands where the language does not force him into one style or another. Visual Studio does keep a naming convention for the events it creates (which should be fairly obvious). Please build the project and retry, or set the Output Path and AssemblyName properties appropriately to point at the correct location for the target assembly." Which tells me nothing because either Visual Studio 2013 Cannot Start Debugging
No code, no answer. VB.net is the successor to VB6, which has similar features of VB6, such as the more verbose syntax, but it has a much stronger flexible use case than VB6. Useful (or not) things of mine: Detecting OS Architecture|My Hangman Game Example|Asynchronous File Downloading Queue System|Project RattleSnake|Approximating Integrals| Is my Structure/Class serializable?|FlagCollection VB C#|INI Class VB C# NEW! this content If the suggestion is still relevant, please either take a look to see if there’s another suggestion that’s similar that you can vote on, or open a new suggestion. - The
They're just different animals. Set The Outputpath And Assemblyname Properties Appropriately To Point Reply With Quote Apr 7th, 2013,02:39 AM #5 treddie View Profile View Forum Posts Thread Starter Hyperactive Member Join Date Jan 2007 Posts 448 Re: Visual Studio cannot start debugging because J Fing C!
All rights reserved.
Creating test data using ElasticObject Visual Studio cannot start debugging because the d... So the excuse that it's more lines to type is out the window when the tools utilized in development actually do most of the heavy duty for you. But context is everything. Visual Studio Unable To Start Debugging On The Web Server So why are they there?
And use my phone for what? –Reverb Dec 13 '13 at 12:32 @Reverb Hans was sarcastic and meant you should phone the admin called Martin. Rajesh Dhalange 333,527 views 2:07 ERRO VB2008 START DEBUGGING - Duration: 2:02. Does that make it difficult sometimes? have a peek at these guys this is the only thing that worked!
For instance, double-clicking a button will create the default button_Click() procedure. If you happen to actually look at a call stack of some functions, it can go several layers deep, and then that has to be unwound to get back to the The Build option in the Configuration Manager was no longer checked for any of my build targets. –Brad Cathey Aug 21 '13 at 16:46 Year and a half later vb.Net Controversy.doc Just so you know, I actually took the time to read your entire document.
Anonymous commented · September 29, 2013 12:13 · Flag as inappropriateFlag as inappropriate · Delete… It did not work at all New and returning users may sign in Sign in prestine When I moved the Solution to another location on my computer the problem occurred because it was searching for an absolute path to the executable file.